Which then begs the question - is Bear Stearns the only major investment bank out there to be in such serious trouble? Weren't the Bear executives, just like the executives of all major investment banks swearing up and down that the effects of the sub-prime loans, credit crunch, market downturn etc.,etc. were rather negligible? I mean, damn it, look at this statement from the Yahoo article
JPMorgan's acquisition of Bear Stearns represents roughly 1 percent of what the investment bank was worth just 16 days ago. It marked a 93.3 percent discount to Bear Stearns' market capitalization as of Friday, and roughly a 98.8 percent discount to its book value as of Feb. 29.How is that even possible unless assets were ridiculously overvalued (I'm looking at you creative accountants)? Hmm...maybe I should have taken those Chartered Accountancy exams anyway (not too late to get a CPA though). Accountants shall inherit the earth.
You know what, much as I try, I just cannot squeeze out even a shred of schadenfreude about this. I mean sure, investment b(w)ankers have a reputation for arrogance and general assholic behaviour, and at least the top executives at Bear Stearns deserve to be skewered for their general incompetence and short-sighted focus on fat cat bonuses while running the company to the ground. One cannot talk enough about the moral hazards of playing professional investment banker with someone else's money.
However, Bear employs 14000 employees, and there is great uncertainty about the future of those jobs, given that no one has a clue as to what exactly JP Morgan wishes to do with the company. This is a distress sale, and Bear Stearns couldn't possible dictate any of its terms.
Tomorrow brings much palpitation and trepidation to the financial markets. The fallout of the Bear Stearns affair promises to be messy. This is where it helps to be the over-educated poor. One can watch with bemused disinterest and sigh over human folly. No money, no cry.